February 09 2010 08:50:50
Navigation
· Home
· Discussion Forum
· News Categories
· Staff Page
· Search
· RSS Feeds
· Ultimate Stat Page
· Links
· Contact
· Voice Your Opinion
News Feeds




Welcome
Lessons we won’t take away from Balloon Boy incident

Advert
Opinions Share
For four hours one sunny afternoon in October, a floating quilt of tin foil, Visqueen, and duct tape captivated a bored American news media. One z-list reality star, looking to jump to c-list reality star, took his too-honest six-year-old on a media blitz that made Obama look unambitious, and was given two days of sit-downs and exclusives and front-pages from our largest news outlets.

Three days later, Ashton walked out of a Colorado courthouse to tell us what we’d all just started to figure out: we had indeed been Punk’d.

Suddenly, the only story the media wanted to cover more than Balloon Boy was Balloon Boy’s awful, dishonest, lying, cheating, pathetic, poor, and now criminal father. By the end of the day, commentators were talking about taking Richard Heene’s kids away, and the whole bored American nation had turned against him.

If Heene learns anything from this incident (although that seems very unlikely), it should be that there is no greater crime in the eyes of the self-proclaimed “Fourth Branch” than to make that very institution, the noble, honest, Constitution-protected Press, look foolish. They are the gatekeepers: they dictate the national consciousness.

However, some rogue members of the mighty Press have been brazen enough to criticize themselves and their colleagues for the coverage of the incident. Linda Holmes wrote on NPR.com that the incident demonstrated that the modern media is more concerned about reporting with certainty than reporting with truth.

Speaking of media reaction to young Falcon’s now-famous comments to Wolf Blitzer – “We did this for a show” – Holmes said: “It's just a bit disheartening to see, less than 24 hours after the last time so many people labored under a misunderstanding of the circumstances of this same situation, that there's so little reluctance to jump to a conclusion about what's going on now. Surrounded by coverage and surrounded by guessing, it's gotten very hard to shrug your shoulders.”

The media shift from saying something factual to just, well, saying something has been in the spotlight since the 2000 election, when CBS and NBC famously declared that Florida – and the presidency – had been taken by Al Gore, only to later give them to W., only to eventually admit that they really had no clue who won. NBC’s own report on the incident stated that “Being right, not first, is what matters.”

But despite countless Poynter criticisms and SNL parodies and lost viewers, being first is still the standard for which most news outlets seem to strive. Just watch your local evening news, which is the only news medium that is still a regular financial success across the board. “First at Five!” they say. “Your first look, from Channel 6!” “The 13 crew was first on the scene!” Ever hear a commercial for “CBS 10, always correct!” Or how about, “WTHR 13, we report the truth!”

The bottom line is that this is a want-it-now culture. We text because we can’t wait until after we’re done driving home to tell our sister how our date went. We buy mortgages we can’t afford because it’s unfair for our friends to have nicer houses than us. If our pizza isn’t in our stomachs within 30 minutes of us deciding we’re hungry, we demand a refund. The dangers of car accidents, impending foreclosures, and crappy pizzas don’t cross our demanding minds.

So who cares whether the kid was actually in the damn balloon? The truth came out – in the Internet age, it always does. (Ask Mark Sanford.) There was a time when the common man had little access to information outside his own tiny existence. There was a need for Walter Cronkite and Bob Woodward, those willing to dig a little and take a little time, if it meant getting the story right.

But those days are long past. We don’t need a report of what happened at Lakehurst anymore; we’re watching the flames live. The real tragedy of this all isn’t the fall of Big Media; Big Media still exists, it’s just run by us. The tragedy is that after millions of us are led on a wild-goose chase across the Colorado landscape, after a balloon that we would have known probably couldn’t even lift off with a boy inside had we stopped to call one physicist, is that we’re all dumb enough to applaud and ask for more.
Comments
#1 | showerjuggernaut on November 03 2009 16:15:21
timroy -

i understand that the 24hour news cycle gives a lot of attention to stories that don't really matter. but i maintain that balloon boy was a legit news story.

1. since 9/11, any time something flies and shuts down an airport, that's news.

2. "dog bites man, not a story. man bites dog, story." so even though the war in afgan. and the economy are more important stories, they have been happening every day for a long time. can't remember the last time a wierd science experiment may or may not be carrying a little kid across 3 counties.

3. i think a lot of people thought the kid might not be in the balloon...and i guess i don't know, did any of the news outlets say that the boy was definitely in the balloon? or did they jsut say "believed to be?" cause maybe that's the difference between responsible and irresponsible reporting.
#2 | rwahrens on November 03 2009 16:45:45
I think they said "may be" or "reported to be" or some such. I don't remember anybody saying he definitely was. Nobody really knew.
#3 | timroy on November 03 2009 18:32:12
Good points.

I guess I don't mean to say that the story wasn't newsworthy, or that the networks made any major mistakes.

I suppose this article could be summed up in one sentence: shouldn't we all feel a little silly after spending so much time, money, and attention covering and watching the story?
#4 | jenncarpenter on November 03 2009 20:05:31
I see many people criticize the news organizations for covering this and not "what's important". The thing is that the general audience doesn't watch "what's important". Sensation and exaggeration and unusualness is what draws viewers. Media isn't solely to blame.
#5 | rwahrens on November 03 2009 21:12:49
Well, since we all got fooled, I don't think there's any blame to go around. After all, most people probably tuned in hoping to see that kid fall out of the balloon, just like the media filmed it just in case he did!

jenn is right, sensationalism sells - remember, "if it bleeds, it leads"!
#6 | showerjuggernaut on November 04 2009 08:00:45
for sure the audience is to blame just as much or maybe more than the news sources.

i'm sure cbs doesn't want to be covering john and kate plus 8, but if all the other networks are, and are getting good ratings, they don't have much of a choice.

the only place i find real, in-depth journalism anymore is pbs and npr...they have an advantage because ratings aren't as important to them.

i wonder what it wold take to make real news profitable again. maybe american culture has just shifted too far away from that ever happening again.
#7 | timroy on November 04 2009 22:26:31
I don't know about that...people definitely still care about "hard news."

I think the real problem is that the 24 hour news-cycle means any story gets old really quickly, so the time between real breaking news has to be filled with fluff.

If having to watch legit news sources report on ridiculousness is the cost of having unprecedented around-the-clock access to the world, then I guess maybe it's a small price to pay.
#8 | jordanschroeder on November 06 2009 14:49:35
Last year's summer when gas prices went way up, I was forced to watch local news. Every night they would talk about it and interview people that were mad. Horrible reporting! First of all everyone that can read knew gas was up and its not news that some 40 year old with no shirt and one shoe doesn't like to pay higher gas prices. They never reported why it was going up, how long it was going up, or even what the gov't or corporations were doing about it. And when the gas prices went down, they didn't report anything, if i were TV local news I would just feed a bunch crap that sounds good, then at least the stupid people are happy after watching.
If you want real news just read the Wall Street Journal and turn the TV off. TV news is for people who can't read.
#9 | showerjuggernaut on November 07 2009 10:42:57
that's probably why tv news is the only profitable news anymore...it's not news, it's basically an episode of csi miami, all that gets on is guns and sex.

althought the wall street journal? i don't think anybody should be that boring. do they still use the dot-matrix pictures instead of real photos? is it still owned by that right-wing nutjob? i think usa today has good stuff in it. also, the IDS, with colin dougdale.
Post Comment
Please Login to Post a Comment.
Ratings
Rating is available to Members only.

Please login or register to vote.

No Ratings have been Posted.
Latest Articles
Last 10 Comments
With a Public Platform, Sarah Palin is Moving Secretly Behind Scenes
12283 "The Gravina Island Bridge, commonly referred to as the "Bridge to Nowhere", was a proposed bridge to replace the ferry that currently connects the town of Ketchikan, Alaska with Gravin - seaman93555
With a Public Platform, Sarah Palin is Moving Secretly Behind Scenes
12283 "Supports female equal rights, equal pay, and a number of related issues She has openly and, through her actions, opposed equal rights for gay citizens As those who are regulars on this site kno - seaman93555
Russian passenger jet crashes in Ukraine
15 What is up everyone? My name is Jessica. I am from Slovakia. I am new to the forum and just wanted to say hi.. I hope I posted this in the right section on your forum... [u - juliuspowers
Palin Willing to Run in 2012
12295 [quote]I'm not here to pick fights with people who use mean or offensive language...[/quote] Particularly when you agree with their worldview. Do I owe you a nickle for that shrink session? - JohnWarePT
Palin Willing to Run in 2012
12295 Ah...this is why I try to avoid these spaces. Even in the most professional contexts, this new media feedback section just isn't as productive as it was hyped to be. I'm not here to pick f - mbentel
Palin Willing to Run in 2012
12295 "Loony" and "idiotic" are mild compared to Lionel Rolf's rant referring to Ronald Reagan as a "senile imbecile" and Sarah Palin as a "hate buoy." But I g - JohnWarePT
With a Public Platform, Sarah Palin is Moving Secretly Behind Scenes
12283 Dr. Haines, Your first mistake was making broad statements about Governer Palin's positions without first researching and attributing a reputable source. As a medical intern, I think you know - JohnWarePT
Study Reveals Three Most Important Factors Of Childhood Obesity
12305 Problems with this study: 1. It appears that the scientists first decided what would be the most important factors and set out to "prove" their hypothesis. Such studies are notorious fo - ethwc
With a Public Platform, Sarah Palin is Moving Secretly Behind Scenes
12283 Okay, I promised a better supported statement, here it is. Most of the positions presented here can be found at [u - ethwc
Palin Willing to Run in 2012
12295 @ smithy12: uh...thanks for bringing name calling into this. Your comment after "for your information" would have completely sufficed and been respectable. Instead you had to (incorrectly - mbentel
Most Recent Opinion Pieces
The State of Change
Political Log Jams
Is Obama Going to Force Leftists to the Center?
Women's Role Vastly Changing in 21st Century
Massachusetts and the Democrat Party
Prop8 in trial - Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Torture and John Yoo
Comcast v. FCC: A Look at Net Neutrality
Health care cost 101: Physical therapy
The Trouble with Journalism
In Yemen, the Enemy Is the Narrative
Court Ruling on Taser Use Puts Officers' Lives at Risk
A Brief Analysis of Race in American Popular Culture
Health Care Reform Imperfect, But It's A Start
Habitat for Humanity
Fossil Fuel Versus Alternatives
Copenhagen: The Great Crime Scene
We Can't Always Sing and Dance: In Memory of A Good Friend
The Problem of Evil
Where the Banks Went Wrong: The Depositor
Advertisers
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Adverts
Top Stories Past 7 Days
With a Public Platform, Sarah Palin is Moving Secretly Behind Scenes 15
Prayer Breakfast a Delicate Situation for Spain's PM 10
Palin Willing to Run in 2012 7
Amazon Accepts Macmillan Price Model 6
Russian passenger jet crashes in Ukraine 5
‘No Child’ Law to Receive Reform Treatment 3
Obama Seeks Spending Freeze with Spiraling Budget 3
New Orleans Elects Landrieu as Mayor 2
Study Reveals Three Most Important Factors Of Childhood Obesity 1
China and Australia Sign Coal Deal 1