September 02 2010 17:19:04
Navigation
· Home
· Discussion Forum
· News Categories
· Staff Page
· Search
· RSS Feeds
· Ultimate Stat Page
· Links
· Contact
· Voice Your Opinion
News Feeds




Welcome
David v. Goliath

Advert
Opinions Share
I’d like to start a discussion on the benefits of medical marijuana and the pros and cons of legalizing it for medical use. I need to inject a “personal” aspect in the discussion, not only personal to me, but it will be to many of you too.

I’m writing this piece on behalf of a friend of mine and a friend to many of our regular readers here at ToTheCenter.com. His name is David, but most of you know him as seaman93555. David is fighting a losing battle with prostate cancer. He has received chemotherapy treatment, but stopped it once it was no longer doing him any good. He is in a great deal of pain and discomfort. Recently, he has also been diagnosed with a brain tumor which is adding severe headaches and eye pressure to his other sources of pain. He is also experiencing numbness in his right leg, below his knee, and he is easy prey for opportunistic infections.

Back in early January, David wrote and said that that day, his doctor told him that there is little that can be done for his condition, and he had referred him to Hospice. David had been wanting to start up this discussion himself, however he is growing too weak and the words get jumbled for him at times. I’m hoping he may be able to add some comments if we can get a good discussion going. So here goes nothing. This is for you, David.

Even though I am for the legalized use of medical marijuana, I’m not really “up” on where we stand, as a country, on legalizing it. So I’ve done some reading, and here are some interesting things I’ve found.

According to Wikipedia, the medicinal benefits of marijuana seem to be boundless, and many have been known and made use of for 4,000 years. Marijuana has been found to relieve nausea, lack of appetite, vomiting, hemorrhoids, headaches, insomnia, gastrointestinal disorders, nosebleeds, inflammation, muscle spasms, stomach cramps, constipation and pain. It has been found useful in the treatment of alcoholism, addiction to other drugs such as heroin, migraines, spasticity, neurogenic pain, movement disorders, asthma, glaucoma, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, depression, PTSD, ADD, ADHD, OCD, panic disorders, Chrohn’s Disease, bipolar disorder, PMS, and hypertension. Even the seeds have been used to expel tapeworms. It has been found beneficial in treating the side-effects of other medical treatments for cancer, AIDS, IBD, and hepatitis. Its properties include those of an antiseptic, analgesic, diuretic, anti-emetic, anti-epileptic, anti-inflammatory, anti-pyretic, anti-spasmodic, anti-convulsant, immunomodulator, and bronchodilator.

The use of marijuana for medicinal purposes has been endorsed by the American Medical Association, American College of Physicians, Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, American Academy of Family Physicians, American Public Health Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Nurses Association, British Medical Association, AIDS Action, American Academy of HIV Medicine, Lymphoma Foundation of America, and Health Canada.

On Election Day, 2008, Michigan became the 13th state in the U.S. to pass a proposition to allow the use of medical marijuana, as prescribed by their doctor, to patients with serious or terminal illnesses. One quarter of the country now allows treatment with medical marijuana, which would seem a good indicator that more will follow. However, the fight to receive this right will be a much longer and harder battle than many realize. Even in states that have already approved the use of medical marijuana, battles continue to rage.

In California, in particular, the Compassionate Use Act was passed in 1996, making California the first state to legalize the use of medical marijuana. In 2004, SB420 was passed which provided even more protections and made California’s medical marijuana use laws the most comprehensive in the country. Basically, doctors and patients are given the right to prescribe and use, respectively, medical marijuana. But due to conflicts between state and federal law regarding the use and distribution of medical marijuana, i.e., both are illegal under federal law, cities and towns across the state can and do have ordinances prohibiting licensure of dispensaries, federal raids of dispensaries still occur, and police have the right, with “probable cause,” to search, seize, and arrest patients, even after verifying that the patient has the proper documentation authorizing the medical use.

David would seem to be a prime candidate who could benefit from medical marijuana. However, he lives in one of these cities/towns in California I mentioned earlier, which is very conservative and afraid that having a dispensary there would open the door for corruption among their teen population. A dispensary that had opened there has since been closed. And I believe an ordinance is in place to disallow another licensure of this kind of facility. Even if David had the opportunity to travel elsewhere in the state to obtain medical marijuana, he has to have it prescribed by a doctor, and his doctor does not want to go against the community and therefore will not prescribe it for him. I’m afraid David is going to be another victim of too little, too late.
Comments
#1 | Kutch on February 12 2009 23:37:29
Marijuana is a harmless drug. If you want to get rid of think that kill people and have caused the most deaths, due to addiction or just using it too often. The country should make cigarettes illegal because they kill more people every year then any other drug, and even red meat kill more people. There are countries all over the world where marijuana is common and not really illegal. And in these countries there is typically less crime
#2 | ethwc on February 13 2009 17:29:29
I don't know that I would go so far as to characterize marijuana as "harmless." There are a number of side effects from it and recent data seem to show some association with cancer. If burned and inhaled, I expect that, in time, it will cause harm to the pulmonary tissue.

Nor is it the miracle drug that proponents hail it to be. It does have a number of beneficial effects, not the least of which is a reported sense of improved tranquility. Clearly, many cancer patients have benefitted from the appetite stimulation and nausea control. Some report improved pain regulation. There can be no doubt that it at least as effective and has fewer side effects than many of the expensive "approved" drugs available.

There is, in my opinion, absolutely no reason for this drug to be illegal. I question if it should even be limited to prescription uses. However, we citizens of this republic seem to have little impact on the decision making of our rulers (I use that term advisedly). The polls I see appear to show that a majority of US citizens support decreased limits to marijuana. However, a similar slight majority reportedly support civil union equality for gay and lesbian couples. The percentage supporting the infusion of a couple trillion dollars into our economy to "rescue" it varies from a slight majority to a slight minority. Any bets on whether the infusion will occur and by a significant majority of our rulers?

I must confess that I am a bit of an anachronism. While I support legalization of marijuana, I have never experienced the drug myself. It may be that it is time to explore the use of civil disobedience to end the unjustified restriction on our liberty in this case. Civil disobedience is a powerful weapon in the hands of committed citizens who are willing to suffer some degree of discomfort in order to force their leaders to recant from inappropriate legislation. A few thousand lighting up on the capital mall might make a statement that the rulers could not ignore. Any takers?
#3 | Mama Kin on February 13 2009 18:18:17
I am so sorry to read about David's condition. I think he should have the option of using medical marijuana. I'm tired of people jumping on the anti bandwagon without thinking about it. Big hugs David.
#4 | wilddog789 on February 13 2009 18:35:21
I love your proposal, ethwc! I think I'd be tempted to join in on that demonstration. You've made some good points. I've seen the recent headlines suggesting that marijuana can cause cancer, but I'm not really convinced.
#5 | Oldfart on February 13 2009 18:55:29
The peculiar thing about marijuana is that the weed itself is classified as a more dangerous drug than the main component, THC. That is a carry over, I suspect, of the myth of "demon weed" from the 30's and 40's. And, it seems, there is nothing that can be done to convince whoever has the authority, to reclassify it as a (much) lesser evil. I, myself, never did like the stuff much. It made me claustrophobic and made my teeth hurt. Not to mention the "risus sardonicus" effect. However, I don't like shrimp either and I would never consider banning shrimp from someone who needs it.

Marijuana is a relatively innocuous drug that should be used for whatever medicinal properties it has and, as far as drugs go, is much less damaging than alcohol and/or cocaine.

I have a friend who (illegally) uses marijuana for pain management and who, as an engineer, designs and sells drug administration "appliances" and sells them on the internet. He takes a chance. If I needed it, no law would stop me from getting and using it. Should the police take exception, death by cop is, after all, one form of legal assisted suicide.

Seaman, I hope you find something to make your life easier. My heart, such as it is, is with you.
#6 | MplsVala on February 14 2009 15:43:36
A few thousand lighting up on the capital mall might make a statement that the rulers could not ignore. Any takers?
Actually, I've tried this. Not thousands, sadly, but hundreds of us gather yearly on the St. Paul capital steps and grounds and openly smoke in protest. We are always politely ignored. No one has ever been arrested and no violence or damages. But also no results. (Except a lovely day having a smoke with friends out in the open.) Wisconsin has been doing it quite a while too, but I don't know how that's worked for them, I've never made it to one of theirs.

It bugs me. Way back in my first English comp course I did my 10 page paper on this. I titled it "End the New Prohibition Now!" and blew my fellow students minds. After doing the research on it, I am firmly of the opinion that MJ was made illegal at the behest of the liquor lobby. I was shocked because a friend's mother had MS and her doctor told her to try to find some. So, here's a middle aged white lady trying to score street drugs because her doctor isn't allowed to give her what she needs! What an outrage. As is David/Seaman's situation. We're having another crack at pushing MM through in MN. It is being discussed on the floor currently. The top Republican, who blocked mightily the last time we tried, has found that his father's experience with cancer has changed his views, so he reports feeling deeply conflicted on this matter now. He feels great responsibility as the Top Rep to carry their flag, but he's afraid they're wrong on this one. It is a very limited bill, only four illnesses are acknowledged as servere enough to merit it, but it would cover both Seaman and my friend's mom. That's a start. It is criminal of us as a society to let our citizens suffer needlessly. Our demented Governor Pawlenty has promised to veto it, but support may be great enough to over-ride him. I certainly hope so and am doing everything I can think of to assist.

If I needed it, no law would stop me from getting and using it. Should the police take exception, death by cop is, after all, one form of legal assisted suicide.
LOL. I hear that.

We need more ideas on this. I wrote up the DIGG submission, so if you are a member please take a minute to vote for it. Maybe we can generate a wider discussion.
#7 | MplsVala on February 14 2009 17:08:02
I've seen the recent headlines suggesting that marijuana can cause cancer, but I'm not really convinced.
I think breathing in too much of any kind of smoke can lead to lung troubles including cancer. I suspect genetics plays a role in how susceptible one is to that. But that is a rather slow process I'd guess, so it isn't much of an issue for the terminally ill and may be well worth the risk to many for the pain relief or other perceived benefits. And those benefits do vary from person to person. It will never do to ignore individual differences.
#8 | seaman93555 on February 15 2009 17:33:01
Finally found the link, thanks to wildog789 - I wanted to comment on this article, since it is very personal to me. In California, where I live, Medical marijuana is legal, yet due to the paranoia and hystery of the drug's history in American society (most notably, the 1930's and then later with Nancy Reagan and her crusade against all illegal drugs, the matter has been pushed to back-burner on most people's radar.

To ascertain my condition to people reading this story and comments, the realities are that I continue to suffer, in silence, due to the extremely conservative nature of the small community, where I live with my mother. My condition is terminal, so what harm can be done by allowing myself and others, who are in the same position, as I, from having a little quality of life.

MplsVala, I concur with your views on the use of Marijuana, since when did it become the government's responsibility to protect us from the "evils of the world". Alcohol is far more damaging a drug, since it can lead to renal failure and other complications, which are far worse, than allowing someone to enjoy a "toke with a friend". I am not aware of anyone contracting lung cancer, as a result of the use of marijuana, though I could be wrong, I believe one would have to smoke it like they do cigarettes.

As to the argument that many raise in my community about the use of marijuana - they seem far more concerned with stereotypes than with realities. They are concerned their children will get the drug - well, I have news for them, the illegal drug trade in my community is already high among children and high school students and allowing a Medical marijuana shop in town will not change that reality. At one time, there was just a shop, but it was banned in Kern County by the powers that be - stupid choice, in my view!
#9 | vmohan123 on February 17 2009 00:50:47
Since I haven't smoked marijuana myself, I won't attest to the side effects or anything of that matter. David, I think it would only make sense that you be allowed to use a readily available resource to curb your pain.

The reason the government has to curtail the use of marijuana is because for every person who understands the pros and cons of using the drug, there is someone who can be drawn into it and consumed by an unhealthy addiction. However, I'm inclined to say this reason shouldn't apply to you. The reduction of your pain can't possibly have any detrimental effect on others.

I also agree cigarettes and alcohol are destructive substances that are probably as much "evils of the world" as any other drug, but you have to recognize they came around at a time where medicine wasn't sophisticated enough to understand the ramifications of such addictive commodities. And in those days, addictive = GOOD BUSINESS! I think if marijuana was turned into a legitimate business venture, it could drastically change the way people live. Just think of how cigarettes alone manage to cut the lifespan of so many.
#10 | seaman93555 on February 17 2009 04:13:52
Thank you vmohan123 for your caring and compassion, yet I agree to disagree with you on the subject of marijuana - it was banned in the United States during the 1920's prohibition era and since this time, much has been learned about the benefits, as well, as the detrements of the drug. I believe, the genie is already out of the bottle, when it comes to cigarettes and alcohol and to some extent, marijuana, yet the drug is not nearly, as addictive, as are cigarettes and alcohol. I also believe, there will always be those, who cannot control their own urges and for them, I have empathy.

At the same time, there are also benefits, besides the pain management, like the fact that marijuana has been used to treat cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy (which is most widely recognized), since it helps considerably with nausea. By the way, I used to be a nurse in Seattle and witnessed first-hand the benefits of marijuana.
Post Comment
Please Login to Post a Comment.
Ratings
Rating is available to Members only.

Please login or register to vote.

No Ratings have been Posted.
Latest Articles
Last 10 Comments
Vanity Fair Journalist Bashes Sarah Palin in Scathing Article
13169 I am an English professor of over twenty years. I am published, no New York Times best seller, yet, but some of my stories are popular sellers. I enjoy a lot of inside connections within my writers - PurlGurl
Constitution and the Ground Zero Mosque
13132 Excellent piece. Thanks for taking the time to write it. - MplsVala
Sex on TV linked to teen pregnancy
7475 I too agree because The [u - jenifer111
ABC's 9-11 Movie
105 ABC is good channel. Its recently aired show[u - jenifer111
Newspapers vs. Internet
8877 I too agree with this point. Newspapers are no longer reliable and dying in their popularity. Internet is the fast pace medium to read the live news. I usually read about tv shows from here. I like in - jenifer111
Steven Slater: A Working-Class Hero?
13110 Well I guess same about it.. - jenifer111
Constitution and the Ground Zero Mosque
13132 Amen. I doubt very much that the writers intended for habeas corpus to be suspended while fighting a nebulous war against a criminal international group. Al Queda is an organization of evil doers bu - ethwc
E-Readers: Technologically Savvy or Just Lazy?
13143 One has choices for the device to be used. I, for one have refused to pay 300 or more for a reader and use my regular PC with software downloaded for free from Amazon. Literally thousands of books a - ethwc
Constitution and the Ground Zero Mosque
13132 Ed, I applaud your essay, I could not have said it better. I would add, however, that the Constitution DOES give the President the power to suspend habeus corpus in the cases of invasion or of insu - rwahrens
What To Do With Iran?
13133 Well Ethwc, it's going to be tough to deal with Iran now. What should have been done years ago was to allow Israel to go in there and bomb the nuclear plant while it was still being built. But - Anthony W Leone
Most Recent Opinion Pieces
Political Motives For Iraq Withdraw?
Attack On Muslim Cabbie Doesn’t Add Up
ABBEY ROAD:
Some Good Memories
What To Do With Iran?
Constitution and the Ground Zero Mosque
France to Expel Roma Amidst Mounting Criticism
Free Gaza
Can homegrown terrorism be stopped? Or is it a pipe dream?
Cal and the Tea Party
Government Motors (GM)
BP Hedges on Role of Relief Well in Gulf Oil Leak
Arizona's Immigration Law
Who Was the Real Hero of 1910 Bombing of The Los Angeles Times
Is Healthy Good for the Country?
Arizona, Immigration and Lack of Care
Book Review: An Irish Country Village
The beginning of the end for Chrysler
Is Netanyahu Blowing The Usual Smoke?
Why is the “The Twilight Saga” film series so popular?
Natural Disasters, Insurance and the Federal Government
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Adverts
Top Stories Past 7 Days
You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ')group by comment_item_id order by a desc limit 10' at line 1You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ')group by comment_item_id order by a desc limit 10' at line 1
You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ')group by comment_item_id order by a desc limit 10' at line 1